🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that may create several five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to lift a lower court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The ruling occurs during a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Usually, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic leaders lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A top House leader said the court had another time damaged its standing by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.