🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in other member states